how did Hamas come close to Iran?

 Hamas’s relationship with Iran has evolved significantly over the years, characterized by mutual interests and strategic partnerships. This alliance has been shaped by a combination of ideological alignment and realpolitik, particularly in the context of their shared opposition to Israel.

Historical Context

Hamas, an Islamist militant group formed in the late 1980s as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, initially received support from various sources, including the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). However, following the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, Tehran began to extend its influence to Palestinian factions, including Hamas. The Iranian regime viewed support for Palestinian groups as part of its broader strategy to confront Israel and the United States, which it perceives as existential threats to its security and stability.

Financial and Military Support

Iran has been a crucial backer of Hamas, providing substantial financial assistance, arms, and military training. Estimates suggest that Iran contributes around $100 million annually to Hamas and other Palestinian groups, which is vital for their military capabilities. This support has included training operatives and supplying weapons, enabling Hamas to develop its own missile production capabilities, which have been utilized in various conflicts with Israel.

Strategic Alignment

The relationship between Hamas and Iran can be described as a "marriage of convenience." While both parties share a common goal of opposing Israel, their alliance is not without its complexities. For instance, tensions arose when Hamas opposed the Iranian-backed Syrian regime during the Syrian civil war, leading to a temporary cooling of relations. However, the overarching need to counter Israeli actions has continually drawn them back together.

Recent Developments

In the wake of the October 2023 attacks on Israel by Hamas, which resulted in significant casualties, Iran's support became even more pronounced. Reports indicate that Iranian military officials were involved in planning and supporting the operation, although Iran has publicly denied direct involvement. The attack was reportedly facilitated by years of Iranian training and resources, underscoring the depth of their collaboration.

Conclusion

The Hamas-Iran relationship is a complex interplay of ideology, strategy, and mutual benefit. While Hamas has sought to maintain its independence, it remains heavily reliant on Iranian support for its military operations against Israel. As regional dynamics continue to shift, the future of this alliance will likely depend on the outcomes of ongoing conflicts and the broader geopolitical landscape in the Middle East.