The US Supreme Court invalidates the abortion law.

The 1973 Roe v. Wade decision was overturned by the US Supreme Court by a 6–3 margin.  The decision is now in the hands of the states.

It was obvious that the decision would be rendered before the start of the summer vacation at the end of June, as well as which way it would go. However, when the news first surfaced this morning, Washington was in disarray. The national abortion law, which made abortion legal up to the 24th week, has actually been overturned by the Supreme Court.

In accordance with the conservative majority on the judiciary, the supreme judges made their decision by a vote of six to three. The historic Roe v. Wade decision of 1973, which divided the nation for many years, is now history.

It is safe to say that the turning point, a turning point in US judicial history, was not unexpected. In May, information about a Supreme Court test vote with this exact motivation leaked. The plan was leaked for the first time to an online publication, Politico, and Chief Justice John Robert was so shocked that he opened an inquiry. Judge Samuel Alito argued that abortion-related issues were a state issue rather than a national one. This line was followed in the official judgment.

On Thursday, the decision of another judge had already been used as a signpost. The Supreme Court reversed a New York state law that had recently sparked national outrage following a supermarket shooting in Buffalo by voting 6 to 3 to uphold the right to carry a firearm in public.

TikTok on psychological warfare

Social media sites in China are well-liked globally. “TikTok” is the best example of this. But as it turns out, all of that data is accessible to the Chinese government, which is using it to its advantage to undermine the free world. The leaders of the free nations ought to pause in response to that. Because in Beijing, only one thing is true: No one is above the party.

The debate over the impact of the Chinese dictatorship on public opinion and thought in free countries has been given fresh fuel: This time it’s about the social media platform TikTok. Beijing has access to all the information on the app, which is well-liked among young people and where 1.6 billion people worldwide share brief videos. The American magazine BuzzFeed made this known.

Reporters discovered internal emails from Bytedance, the owner of TikTok, in which he quoted staff members saying things like “China sees everything” and “has access to everything.” The journalists discovered the opposite, despite TikTok’s repeated claims that the Chinese Communist Party does not control it in any way outside of the People’s Republic.

As a result, it is even claimed that a TikTok internal investigation revealed that certain Chinese-developed features on the app are “unknown to their intended use.” The claim that data in the People’s Republic can be accessed from anywhere in the world is also supported by this statement.

In Taiwan, where TikTok is also popular, Beijing is reportedly already using the app for psychological warfare against the Taiwanese population. The island nation, which is democratically run, is regarded as a breakaway province by the People’s Republic. Chinese President Xi has vowed to annex China to the People’s Republic by force.

The Chinese video call provider Zoom, a Covid pandemic winner, is alleged to have summarily rejected meetings and conferences that wanted to discuss a subject that was critical of the Beijing dictatorship, like Hong Kong has permitted. This is not the first time that Chinese companies have faced criticism.

When extending their mobile networks, the USA, England, and France have all banned the technology. The Federal Republic of Germany, which tends to try to do business with corporations based in dictatorships for as long as possible—as the example of Russia made clear—followed the example of its partners only after much deliberation.

Huawei, Zoom, and TikTok are just a few of the companies the leadership of the People’s Republic is using to ruthlessly and illegally expand its influence around the globe and use stolen information against people who are concurrently paying for the use of Chinese offers.

The American intelligence does not provide the Ukrainians with all the information

The American intelligence does not provide the Ukrainians with all the information

American intelligence is not allowed to inform Ukrainian partners about the location of individual Russian commanders or politicians. Nor can they help them attack targets in Russia, according to Joe Biden’s administration guidelines, which the Washington Post reported. The idea is to avoid Russia’s accusation and not to lead to US-Russian confrontation.

” President Joe Biden’s administration has developed guidelines for sharing intelligence with Ukraine . They are designed to avoid escalating tensions between Washington and Moscow . The recommendations contain two broad prohibitions. 

The US cannot provide Ukraine with detailed data that would assist in killing key Russian commanders. or politicians , such as the chief of the general staff or the minister of defense. The second forbidden category is any information that helps Ukraine in attacking enemy targets outside the country (ie on the territory of Russia – ed.) “- emphasized in the article.

As reported by the American daily, concerns about the Kremlin ‘s reaction to the second type of US support for Ukraine prompted the White House to suspend plans to provide Poland with fighters to Ukraine . The Ukrainian side could use these machines to launch attacks on Russian territory , which would be contrary to American guidelines.

No high-level target data available

The United States also adopted a rule that prohibits disclosure of “target information ” to Ukraine . In practice, this means that Washington is not sharing reports that a particular Russian general has been spotted in a particular location , nor is it assisting Kiev in carrying out attacks on such persons or objects. However, it is allowed to provide data on enemy command and control centers, which are places where senior Russian officers are frequently present.

According to the Washington Post, such information could ” help Ukraine in its own defense “. If the Ukrainian commanders decided to hit such a facility, it would be their decision – the authors of the article assessed. They also indicated that an example of cooperation with Kiev , which leads to the destruction of enemy units, but does not exhaust the definition of US direct responsibility , was the sinking of the Russian cruiser “Moscow” by Ukrainians , which took place on April 14.

“Then Moscow would have an argument to answer”

“If the United States were supplying information about targets to a foreign entity and we were closely involved in making decisions about targets, then we would be directing the force and they would act on our behalf,” said Scott R. Anderson , a former State Department official and former adviser. Legal of the US Embassy in Baghdad . “It could be seen as approaching the border of a real attack on Russia , and then Moscow would have an argument to respond,” he stressed.

US Supreme Court towards the cancellation of the right to abortion.

At least 24 states are ready to abolish access to the termination of pregnancy.

The first huge possible social consequence of the sentence will therefore be the splitting of the United States into two parts. In one it will be possible for women to terminate the pregnancy. In the other, abortion will be punished with prison.

Protests erupt in front of the Supreme Court and in many American cities. The conservatives cheer, who for decades have stubbornly tried to erase the right to abortion. Democrats and women’s rights groups express their indignation. Jurists and lawyers discuss the legal foundations of the sentence.


The Russian arsenal scares the West, not just because of its nuclear warheads. The risk of escalation seems increasingly real. Should we worry?

With the war showing no signs of appeasing its devastation and the climate of negotiations now steadily traveling along the tracks of tension , peace in Ukraine seems increasingly distant. The latest threat launched by Vladimir Putin to the West, considered co-belligerent of Ukraine for having sent weapons and war material , also comes to further stir the waters .

If Russia is threatened, it could respond swiftly ( is there really a risk of World War III and nuclear escalation? We talked about it here ). The warning sounds even more alarming, if linked to the “Tsar’s” belief that the West constitutes “a threat to the very existence of his country”. But what are these “secret” means that the Western allies do not possess? What weapons does the Russian army really have at its disposal?

Means “never seen before”: which ones and how dangerous they are
From nuclear warheads to super intercontinental missiles , passing through submarines and chemical and biological weapons : the Russian war arsenal is certainly one of the most formidable in the world. When he gave his last threatening speech, Putin certainly had in mind the Sarmat , tested last week (here we talked about the…). An intercontinental missile which, according to the Russian president, “has no equal in the world” and which is “capable of evading any defense system”.

Beyond the propaganda and the threat, the Sarmat is indeed a fearsome weapon. It is a ballistic missile with atomic capability that can hit the United States in a very short time. A 200-ton “monster” capable of carrying 15 nuclear warheads and dropping them along a flight path of up to 18,000 kilometers.

Then there are the now famous hypersonic missiles, such as the Kinzhal and the Avangard . Russia has already used them in Ukraine to destroy enemy weapons depots. They are vectors that follow different trajectories than intercontinental ones and that reach a speed at least five times higher than that of sound (6,190 km per hour). Translated: in an hour I am able to hit practically a target anywhere in the world. Among the hypersonic devices there is also the Zircon , with a range of action ranging from 500 to a thousand kilometers.

However, the Kremlin’s missile equipment does not end here. The list also includes nuclear-powered cruise warheads, such as the Burevestnik . It is a technology that you don’t have a lot of information about. It is estimated that it has a range of between 10 thousand and 20 thousand kilometers and that it proceeds at low altitude ( here we are talking about which weapons Italy will send to Ukraine ).

Not just missiles: what other weapons can Putin deploy?
The Russian Armed Forces can also count on submarine military vehicles . In this category the Poseidon stands out which, as its name indicates, is an underwater vector that can travel up to a thousand meters deep at a speed of 70 knots. It is able to proceed unmanned, autonomously, with autonomous propulsion. Its cobalt-60 nuclear warhead can hit both naval formations and coastal targets, causing damage inland.

Speaking of bombs , the most dangerous seems to be the so -called Fab-3000 , which ended up in newspapers around the world in the early days of the siege of the Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol (here we have explained how…). It is a super device that contains a significant amount of explosives, with a destruction range of 46 meters and a scattering radius of the fragments of 260 meters. Not only. They would be able to penetrate armor up to 288mm thick

In addition to missiles and nuclear warheads, during the various phases of the conflict in Ukraine – since 2014 – there has often been talk of biological weapons and chemical weapons ( here is what we know about chemical weapons in Putin’s hands ). Russia knows them well, since it has endorsed their use in Syria by the troops of ally Bashar Al Assad . The extreme danger of these weapons lies in the mix between high explosive content and gas or toxins capable of spreading the chemical agent or contagion. In the first case, suffocating agents such as chlorine could be used,blister agents that affect through inhalation and contact, nerve agents . In the case of biological weapons, however, one of the main threats appears to be anthrax (or carbuncle). Western intelligence has repeatedly feared the possibility that Putin could use them in this phase of the war.

The Nuclear Threat: Should We Be Worried?
After the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan , the whole world raised its right hand swearing that such a tragedy would never happen again. But then came the Cold War , which behind the mutual nuclear threats of the opposing blocs of the United States and the Soviet Union built a deadlock on which to keep the peace and avoid World War III . They call it “Mad” , an acronym from the English “Mutual assured destruction” , also called the theory of mutual assured destruction. Put simply: the large-scale use of nuclear weapons would result in the complete annihilation of the attacked country, but also of the attacker).

Today, however, much, if not everything, seems to have changed. Putin’s constant references to the Russian atomic arsenal seem to archive the concept of nuclear deterrence . And the available newspapers do the rest (here you can find the ranking and the list of countries with the most nuclear weapons in the world).

However, the opportunity for nuclear war seems decidedly impractical . The “Mad” theory continues to appear valid and real especially in Washington and Kiev, according to which there are no concrete signs of such a degeneration of the conflict. And, although the CIA warns the danger of underestimating Putin’s threats, it is appropriate to make a distinction between strategic and tactical nuclear weapons.

Tactical weapons and strategic weapons
In the second half of the last century, the nuclear weapons with which the United States and the USSR could have hit each other were of a strategic type : that is to say, they could be used directly from one’s own territory with devastating effects. An effective deterrent, which has made it possible to maintain relative peace.

Current tactical nuclear weapons , on the other hand, have a shorter range and strike over shorter distances. We are talking about smaller bombs than the classic ones, with a range of about one and a half kilometers. In the Russian arsenal there are about two thousand of them , all still to be “triggered” ( Putin’s war is also economic: this is why he cut off the gas in Poland of Bulgaria ).

Be careful though. Because the smallest Russian nuclear weapon already has an impressive charge: it reaches up to one kiloton , the equivalent of a thousand tons of TNT. The largest bomb can reach as much as 100 kilotons . To get an idea: the Little Boy atomic bomb , which killed 146,000 people in Hiroshima , had a charge of 15 kilotons . Not only that: these warheads can be launched with means that multiply their range and speed. As Corriere della Sera recalls , the systems are essentially two:

  • Kalibr missiles : 6.2 meters long and with a range of 1,500-2,500 kilometers.
  • The Iskander-M system : it is activated from the ground and has a range of 400-500 kilometers.

ISS: Astronauts replace broken antennas

Washington / Moscow – Two US astronauts replaced a defective antenna system on the International Space Station during a field mission. Thomas Marshburn and Kayla Barron left the ISS for around six hours and 30 minutes on Thursday, as announced by the US space agency Nasa. The mission – Barron’s first and Marshburn’s fifth – was successful. It had actually been planned for Tuesday, but was postponed due to the danger of debris in space. What kind of rubble it was was not disclosed.

About two weeks ago, the crew of the ISS – including the German astronaut Matthias Maurer – had to get to safety in two spaceships docked at the station because of a feared collision with space debris. A day later, Russia confirmed that its military had tested an anti-satellite missile and shot down a disused satellite.

According to Russian information, the ISS had to dodge space junk again on Friday. The flight path of the station has been lowered by 310 meters, tweeted the space agency Roskosmos. The engines of the spaceship Progress MS-18 docked at the ISS were used for this. The space debris was the remains of a US Pegasus missile, said Roskosmos boss Dmitri Rogozin of the Tass state agency.